Whoa!

The Mt. Ebal Curse Tablet

History IV

[Post ten of thirty]

Our plot now twists.

In 2019, Scott Stripling’s team found a small lead object measuring about 2 x 2 centimeters. Stripling is a professor at the Bible Seminary in Katy, Texas. There, he teaches biblical archaeology and church history

Because of this tiny artifact, millions of people worldwide soon focused anew on Mt. Ebal.

Note

This is the tenth post of my memorandum on the Curse Tablet. It is also the fourth of ten detailing the history of the tablet and the proposed Joshua’s Altar.

If you have accessed this post from other than captivatingtwists.com and wish to start the journey from the beginning, click here.

Otherwise, continue below.

This part of our story starts with Stripling obtaining a permit to resift Zertal’s dump piles on Mt Ebal. 1 Such had lain dormant since well before Zertal’s death.

His purpose was to assess the usefulness of an unheralded wet sifting technique. The process involved washing dry-sifted remains to reveal small, missed artifacts.

In doing so, he sought to make a point. That is the percentage of evidence that archaeologists miss through dry sifting.3

On-site work, however, at Mt. Ebal presented geopolitical headaches.

Stripling, nonetheless, found a workaround.

Authorities allowed him to transport dump material away from the mountain.1

There, his team re-dry sifted. They followed this with wet sifting. 2

In doing this, Stripling expected to find mundane archaeological objects. He figured bullae, scarabs, or pottery fragments, but not pay dirt.

Yet the team’s wet-sifting expert, Frankie Snyder, discovered something in her tray. Recognizing what it was, she announced in effect, “Scott, you want to see this!”4

For Stripling, the sensation was as if his heart jumped to his throat. Instinctively, he cautioned, something like: “Whoa! Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here!”5

Even so, they did!

Now, here are some questions. Did exploring around a creek or mud hole as a kid alert you to the value of wet sifting? Why do you think archaeologists have been so late in using it?

Let me know in the comment section below.

Thank you for engaging with this topic thus far!

Our next post, the fifth of our review of Curse Tablet history, I entitle: “A Defixio?”

I look forward to continuing with you there.

If you appreciate this type of analysis, please “subscribe”, “like”, and “share”.

To support this work, you can donate below. If so, thank you for the encouragement.

Next post: “A Defixio?”